Make transition choices financially clearer.
Emissions reporting alone does not explain transition investment choices. Climate Ltd connects emissions evidence, transition assumptions and financial analysis so finance leaders and transition advisers can discuss capital decisions with the assumptions in view.
What makes this sector hard
Emissions inventories describe the past; capital decisions depend on carbon-price, policy, technology and demand assumptions.
Operational emissions, methane-related data and asset records sit across engineering, operations and finance.
Physical hazards at coastal or remote assets can interact with transition plans.
The agents that matter for oil and gas
Emissions Ledger
Maintain an auditable operating inventory with factor provenance and assumptions available for review.
Transition Risk and Scenario
Apply policy, carbon-price, technology and demand scenarios on one shared scenario basis.
Abatement and Trajectory
Compare reduction options by cost and test the plan against the target pathway to see the remaining gap.
Financial Impact
Show EBITDA, cash-flow and CapEx sensitivities with the driving assumptions visible.


More transparent trade-offs across transition options.

Start with the decision
- Which transition options give the most reduction per dollar, and under which price paths?
- How sensitive are cash flow and CapEx to carbon price and demand?
- Where does the plan fall short of our target pathway?
- Which assets carry both transition and physical exposure?
One problem, one invitation
Scenarios explore plausible conditions; they are not forecasts. Outputs do not automatically determine impairment, valuation or credit decisions.
Screens used in this workflow

Transition Risk

Trajectory

Financial Impact
Bring one oil and gas question. We will show the workflow.
Start with an emissions inventory, a physical-risk assessment, a PCAF portfolio, a TNFD scope, a water-risk question, a disclosure programme or a client advisory workflow.
Request a demo

