Regions

Local regimes. Shared evidence.

Keep one evidence base and review each jurisdiction’s scope, methodology and applicability separately. Climate Ltd supports the workflow; confirmation of requirements stays with you and your advisers.

Request a demoExplore the platform
United States

USA

CFOs, sustainability teams and emissions advisers.
The problem
Activity data, supplier records and emission-factor evidence often sit in separate systems.
How Climate helps
Bring source records, assumptions and review steps into a shared emissions workflow for applicable California SB 253 reporting.
Intended benefit
A more traceable basis for review, with less searching across files.
Supplier recordsEmissions reviewTraceable reporting
United Kingdom

UK

Finance leaders and sustainability consultants.
The problem
A disclosure can describe climate risk without explaining its business implications.
How Climate helps
Use a connected evidence-to-analysis workflow to prepare for UK SRS S1/S2 and explore effects on costs, assets and strategy.
Intended benefit
A stronger connection between reporting and management decisions.
Source evidenceFinancial implicationsDisclosure readiness
Australia

Australia

Directors, CFOs and Australian reporting advisers.
The problem
Climate analysis and financial reporting teams often work in parallel.
How Climate helps
Connect asset exposure, scenarios, assumptions and disclosure evidence for in-scope AASB S2 work.
Intended benefit
Clearer board oversight and a better-supported reporting narrative.
Assess exposureTest scenariosPrepare disclosures
European Union

EU

EU reporting teams, importers and exporters.
The problem
Different reporting obligations generate overlapping evidence requests.
How Climate helps
Organise shared evidence, then apply separate scope and methodology reviews for ESRS disclosures and CBAM goods.
Intended benefit
More consistent records without treating different regimes as interchangeable.
Collect evidenceAssess impactsSupport reporting
Africa

Africa

South African companies and regional climate advisers.
The problem
Climate exposure does not always translate into funded resilience priorities.
How Climate helps
Map exposures, compare response options and document decision evidence; the featured JSE guidance is voluntary.
Intended benefit
A clearer basis for practical adaptation discussions.
Map exposurePrioritise resilienceExplain decisions
India

India

Listed-company sustainability teams and BRSR consultants.
The problem
Collecting metrics is difficult when evidence is distributed across business functions.
How Climate helps
Organise source records and metric reviews for applicable BRSR and BRSR Core work, with human review of completeness.
Intended benefit
More traceable disclosures and clearer ownership of data gaps.
Collect recordsReview metricsTrace disclosures
Canada

Canada

Canadian federally regulated banks and insurers.
The problem
Portfolio exposure can be difficult to connect with governance and risk decisions.
How Climate helps
Connect portfolio evidence and scenario assumptions in climate-risk workflows relevant to OSFI B-15.
Intended benefit
Better-informed oversight and a clearer explanation of risk assumptions.
Assess portfoliosTest scenariosInform governance
Malaysia

Malaysia

Malaysian reporting teams and ISSB advisers.
The problem
Phased reporting adoption still requires substantial evidence preparation.
How Climate helps
Build an evidence workflow around NSRF readiness, climate analysis and disclosure review.
Intended benefit
A practical path from reporting gaps to action priorities.
Organise evidenceAnalyse climate riskSupport disclosure
Singapore and Indonesia

Southeast Asia

Regional CFOs and cross-border sustainability consultants.
The problem
A regional business faces different local rules and repeated evidence requests.
How Climate helps
Maintain shared records while assessing Singapore SGX/ACRA and Indonesia POJK 51 requirements separately.
Intended benefit
Regional visibility with local accountability.
Local requirementsShared evidenceRegional oversight
Türkiye

Türkiye

Türkiye reporting teams and sustainability advisers.
The problem
Standards-based disclosure is harder when risk analysis and supporting records are disconnected.
How Climate helps
Link source evidence, climate-risk assessment and reporting preparation for in-scope TSRS 1/2 work.
Intended benefit
A more coherent business narrative with documented assumptions.
Evidence reviewRisk analysisReporting readiness
Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe

Cross-border businesses and regional advisory partners.
The problem
Geographic proximity does not mean uniform disclosure obligations.
How Climate helps
Map entity-level requirements, then connect evidence and asset-risk analysis; ESRS applies in relevant EU member markets.
Intended benefit
More consistent oversight across differing local reporting regimes.
Map requirementsAssess exposureInform investment
New Zealand

New Zealand

New Zealand climate reporting entities and advisers.
The problem
Scenario analysis can remain separate from strategy and reporting.
How Climate helps
Connect exposure information, scenario assumptions and strategic response evidence for NZ CS 1–3 work.
Intended benefit
A clearer explanation of how climate considerations inform decisions.
Identify exposureExplore scenariosExplain strategy

Applicability of any regime depends on the entity, thresholds and timing. Featured guidance may be voluntary. These descriptions illustrate potential applications and are not certified regulatory integrations or customer results.

See it on your data

Which regime sits on your desk? Bring it to a demo.

Start with an emissions inventory, a physical-risk assessment, a PCAF portfolio, a TNFD scope, a water-risk question, a disclosure programme or a client advisory workflow.

Request a demo