Solutions › Industry & resources › Mining
Mining

Connect site risks with operational resilience.

Water, heat, energy and supply disruption have to be considered together. Climate Ltd combines site evidence, exposure assessment and scenario comparisons so mine operators and their advisers can turn climate risk into planning, investment and reporting conversations.

The pressure

What makes this sector hard

01

A water constraint can become a throughput constraint, and heat or wildfire can affect access, power and contractors without damaging the orebody.

02

Fleet and power transition cases built on average conditions can miss site realities such as winter operation or remote supply.

03

Site risk registers rarely connect hazards to margin, production assumptions and cash flow.

How Climate helps

The agents that matter for mining

Physical Risk

Assess heat, flood, drought, wildfire and cyclone exposure at site, haul-route and infrastructure level under selected pathways.

Transition Risk and Abatement

Test fleet, energy and process options against carbon-price, fuel and power assumptions, with winter or low-availability scenarios stated explicitly.

Adaptation and Financial Impact

Compare resilience measures with modelled avoided loss and show consequences for operating cost, production assumptions and CapEx.

Disclosure

Prepare evidence-linked climate reporting, including AASB S2 where in scope, from the same site-level records.

Mining team reviewing climate evidence
Climate Ltd platform screen
How it benefits mining

A clearer basis for operational and adaptation priorities.

✓A clearer basis for operational and adaptation priorities.
✓Water, energy and continuity risks reviewed in the same scenario framework.
✓Comparable assumptions across sites, so investment discussions are not a stack of separate reports.
✓Reporting that traces back to site evidence, useful for lenders, buyers and boards.
Climate Ltd platform screen
Questions you can answer

Start with the decision

  • Which water, heat or wildfire dependencies could affect production, cost or the next investment decision?
  • What does a lower-emissions haulage or power strategy cost under realistic operating conditions?
  • Which site should receive the next resilience or decarbonisation dollar?
  • What evidence will buyers, financiers and regulators ask for?
A sensible first workflow

One problem, one invitation

Water and energy
Scenario analysis
Resilience planning

Applicability of AASB S2 depends on the entity and reporting thresholds. Engineering assessment and site validation are needed before committing capital to resilience works.

Discuss a mining workflow

In depth

Mining themes the platform is used to explore

Water risk is production risk

Water risk is production risk

Connect water availability with processing, cost and operating choices.

Heat belongs in the operating plan

Heat belongs in the operating plan

Link extreme heat to work planning, equipment assumptions and operating cost.

Decarbonise the fleet. Test the economics.

Decarbonise the fleet. Test the economics.

Put fuel, power, infrastructure and utilisation in the same discussion.

Plan beyond the last tonne

Plan beyond the last tonne

Consider closure, water and rehabilitation assumptions over a longer horizon.

In the platform

Screens used in this workflow

Physical Risk

Physical Risk

Transition Risk

Transition Risk

Adaptation

Adaptation

See it on your data

Bring one mining question. We will show the workflow.

Start with an emissions inventory, a physical-risk assessment, a PCAF portfolio, a TNFD scope, a water-risk question, a disclosure programme or a client advisory workflow.

Request a demo