Bring climate intelligence into portfolio decisions.
Climate evidence is fragmented across investees, assets and locations. Climate Ltd connects portfolio evidence with exposure assessment and investment review so investors can prioritise engagement and capital.
What makes this sector hard
Investee evidence differs in format, boundary and quality.
Portfolio emissions metrics do not on their own explain asset resilience or financial consequences.
Engagement works best when it starts from a specific question.
The agents that matter for asset managers and institutional investors
PCAF
Apply PCAF-aligned methods with attribution inputs, data-quality scoring and coverage.
Entity Risk Aggregation
Aggregate exposure across assets, issuers and sectors.
Scenario and Financial Impact
Test portfolio sensitivity under shared scenarios and connect to value and cash flow.
Disclosure
Prepare portfolio-level reporting linked to evidence.
More coherent portfolio discussions and targeted engagement.
Start with the decision
- Which holdings drive portfolio emissions and risk?
- Where is evidence weakest?
- How sensitive is the portfolio to scenario assumptions?
- What should we engage on first?
One problem, one invitation
PCAF Part A addresses financed emissions; Parts B and C address facilitated and insurance-associated emissions. Confirm the relevant part and edition.
Discuss a asset managers and institutional investors workflow
Screens used in this workflow
Pcaf Results
Entity Risk Aggregation
Scenario
Explore neighbouring sectors
Bring one asset managers and institutional investors question. We will show the workflow.
Start with an emissions inventory, a physical-risk assessment, a PCAF portfolio, a TNFD scope, a water-risk question, a disclosure programme or a client advisory workflow.
Request a demo